After checking into this I was attracted to a declaration from the Chief Executive Officer of among the prominent world networks. He mentioned that text messaging could possibly be considereded the purest type of revenue that the world had ever before seen. Interesting I thought … … worthy of more investigation.
Exactly what was being indicated leads us back to Information, text messages after all are simply a type of information. Exactly what I wish to know is the amount of does a content in fact cost the network.
A solitary content is restricted to 160 characters – this relates to 140 bytes of data (as an optimum). Obviously the ordinary text is not this size and oftens be approximately 35 bytes of information.
So here’s the math!
Typically the mobile networks market packages of 500MB for a standard of £& pound; 7.50. This means that 1 megabyte of data (1,000,000 bytes) is 1.5 p. Do you see where I’m going with this?
If an average message is 30 bytes, you could send out 33,333 contents with 1MB of data – this indicates a single text message expenses 0.00003 dime.
An inconceivably small quantity of money. Please do comprehend that I am using resale values below rather than the actual price to the network.
The Networks charge roughly 10p for a text so as a result the equivalent expense for these 33,333 messages would or program be £& pound; 3,333.00.
10p per text ?? no I have unlimited texting on my phone! Well, you need to ask your self when the Mobile Networks provide you “Unrestricted Content Messaging” for £& pound; 5 per october why on planet would certainly they add a fair use policy of 3000 contents ??? Please understand that I do also believe that anyone sending anywhere near 3000 texts in a month must have a severe look at themselves and find a new hobby.
Now, with the alternative forms of messaging on the marketplace which ask for the individual for the volume of information sent as opposed to the amount of single messages, I have definitely been asking myself whether Content Messaging really has a future? Based upon the figures above, I would have to say … … no!